1. I enclose a copy of the information you requested.
Annex 1 - 5
2. The answer to your question is as follows:
Question 2.1 – Evaluator 4 – original score of “4” - moderation meeting - score of “3”
Question 5.1 – Evaluator 1 – original score of “4” - moderation meeting - score of “3”
Question 5.1 – Evaluator 2 – original score of “4” - moderation meeting - score of “3”
Question 5.1 – Evaluator 4 – original score of “4” - moderation meeting - score of “3”
Question 6.1 – Evaluator 2 – original score of “3” - moderation meeting - score of “2”
Question 6.1 – Evaluator 4 – original score of “4” - moderation meeting - score of “3”
Question 6.2 – Evaluator 3 – original score of “2” - moderation meeting - score of “3”
3. The Technical Evaluation Panel were provided with a guidance document which summarised the award criteria questions/weightings and scoring guide, the same information as detailed in the Instructions to Tenderers (ITT) document provided to Tenderers. The guide also includes an extract of the ITT, ie Schedule 1 (Specification) and Schedule 4 (Management Information). I enclose a copy of the Technical Evaluation Guide and embedded Evaluator Scoring Sheet.
Annex 6 & 7
4. The guidance provided to the evaluation panel members was the same scoring guidance detailed in the ITT document and the Technical Evaluator guide, see Annex 6 & 7.
5. The individual evaluation panel members scoring justification is provided within the documents in response to question 1.
6. All technical evaluation panel members are required to complete a Declaration of Impartiality and Confidentiality Form, please see Annex 8. I can confirm that all evaluators completed this form. There were representatives on the technical panel who are responsible for contract management of the current contract.
Annex 8